Just curious

On the list of things I’d love to read: DC’s cease-and-desist letters to Playboy, if they actually exist. Comment makers over at The Beat suggested, probably quite correctly, that Playboy has been down this particular road often enough that it’s expert at just avoiding actionable copyright infringement.

I mean, looking back on the vigor DC demonstrated with that Batman-and-Robin slash art exhibition from a couple of years ago, I can’t imagine there isn’t some amusingly forceful legalese floating around out there somewhere. Right?