Awards watch

It looks like there are some new additions to the current roster of nominations for the list of Great Graphic Novels for Teens, assembled by the American Library Association’s Young Adult Library Services Association (YALSA). (I say “looks like,” because my memory is far from perfect, so apologies if the books I’ve pegged as new nominations have been there for a while.)

DC’s Minx line seems to be making a favorable impression on nominators, with Re-Gifters joining The Plain Janes. The current edition of Sequential Tart has the first part of an interesting insider’s view of the Minx line from Mariah Huehner, including this assessment of some of the imprint’s early sound bytes:

“Its times like this I really wish marketing a product based solely on its own merits, of which the titles in MINX have a lot, was the preferred method. Putting down other kinds of books aimed at the same demographic doesn’t do much to elevate the medium. And anyway, wouldn’t it be better if teen girls were readings more of everyone’s titles? I don’t think it’s a choice between Manga and MINX. I think you’ll find a lot of crossover.”

The first volume of Fumi Yoshinaga’s The Moon and Sandals (Juné) is an interesting choice, partly because Digital Manga has given it an age rating of 18+. It follows two couples, one adult and one teen-aged, and the older pair does reach a sexual milestone, though I’m blanking on how explicit that encounter was at the moment. I thought the book kind of dawdled in a perfectly likeable way, but it does end with an emotional gut-punch worthy of Natsuki Takaya at her most ruthlessly tear-jerking.

The successful partnership between Tokyopop and HarperCollins (just look at the sales figures for Warriors) hasn’t stopped HC from publishing graphic novels on its own, and Mark Crilley’s Miki Falls books earn two slots on the YALSA list.

As usual, the list also serves as a handy collection of recommended reading for me, with intriguing-sounding titles like Stuck in the Middle: 17 Comics from an Unpleasant Age from Penguin/Viking:

“A very unscientific poll recently revealed that 99.9% of all people who attended middle school hated it.”

Yay! I’m in the majority! (Though 7th and 8th grades were classified as “junior high” back when I endured them, right around the popularization of the internal combustion engine.)

And while it’s only kind of tangentially related, there’s a great interview with this year’s Eisner judges over at Bookslut, one of whom is Robin Brenner, one of the librarians who assemble the YALSA list. Some of my favorite quotes:

“The shift from the collector market to the reader market has been incredibly significant, in terms of just where one can find comics and graphic novels today but also in terms of signifying the growing diversity of what’s out there and what people want to read. I feel the industry can only benefit from a concentration on attracting readers rather than collectors — so the story and artistry of the title is the most important thing.” (Brenner.)

“The industry’s attempt to force-start another speculator glut, is, fortunately, somewhat of a miserable failure.” (Comics writer Chris Reilley.)

“I would like to see a few less comics about zombies; they’re really overstaying their welcome in my opinion.” (Reilly, again.)

Well, zombies do move rather slowly.

Cleaning up

Remember the controversy in California over a library copy of Paul Gravett’s splendid Manga: 60 Years of Japanese Comics? The local paper, the Hesperia Star, does, because it won a regional award from the Society of Professional Journalists for an editorial on the situation:

“If our libraries should be 100 percent sanitized by young children, then let’s get rid of Shakespeare, Chaucer and Hemingway. Let’s not take any chances. Burn the National Geographics before another adolescent sees them.”

Funny how portable that sentiment is.

You can't please everyone… EVER

It seems that not everybody’s happy with the proposed resolution to the complaints over graphic novels in the Davis Library in the Wanganui, New Zealand (which was to move the teen section away from the holdings for children). Guess who?

Yup, concerned mother and part-time teacher Julie Gordon has expressed her discontent to the Wanganui Chronicle:

“‘I’m not happy with this outcome. If library staff want to supply that sort of book for their children then let them go and it buy it at a book store. But I don’t see why we have to have it in our library,’ she said.”

Quotes from local officials suggest that Mrs. Gordon isn’t much for process. After being told the appropriate method for questioning library holdings, she… went to the newspaper instead. As one does.

Shelf shift

The Davis Library in Wanganui, New Zealand, is putting some daylight between its holdings for children and teens, according to this article in the Chronicle.

“In a report to the [Wanganui District Council] [Cultural and Community Manager Sally] Patrick said she had made a request to the Davis library to relocate its teenage area and the graphic novel collection to an place which was clearly separated from the children’s area in order to ‘eliminate’ future confusion.

“In her recommendation to council she said that councillors should agree that the matter would be resolved once the teen area and graphic novels were moved.”

Does anyone else detect a whiff of impatience in the second part of that recommendation? I couldn’t blame her if there was.

Mayor Michael Laws seems satisfied with the resolution:

“‘In essence, this is to ensure that contentious material, available to teenagers, is located further away from the children’s section…my pick is that Council will not want to play censor but alert library management that a heightened sensitivity is in order,’ he said.”

It seems as though the books that sparked the dust-up are going to be kept in the restricted-access dungeon, and that some other similar books might join them after a second look from library staff.

Background and links to earlier articles can be found here.

And just because I can’t resist, readers can get another look at Mayor Laws’ leadership style in this article about a request from Amnesty International:

“‘They are a bunch of idiots, and I don’t respond to idiots.’”

It's not all ecotourism and organic lamb

The Wanganui Chronicle has a follow-up to yesterday’s piece on potentially age-inappropriate graphic novels, talking to librarian Sally Patrick. It sounds like the library is doing everything applicable regulations and good sense require and that the staff is willing to go a bit further, if necessary:

“[Patrick] said the items that [concerned parent who used a child’s library card to check out nipple-baring manga] Mrs [Julie] Gordon submitted for a ruling came back with a classification that was age-appropriate for a teenage collection if that collection is developed for 13 to 18-year-olds.

“‘What the library must then do is ensure the item is classified and access is restricted to the age groups that have been defined.’

“She said the library needed to look at the proximity of the teenage area to the children’s area and ensure that any ‘potential confusion is eliminated’.

“Books with a classification were not publicly accessible in the library and anyone wanting a book carrying an age classification would have to ask staff for it.”

Wanganui Mayor Michael Laws has also become involved:

“‘It is not a question of censoring and removing the books, so much as indicating their appropriateness for which age group,’ he said.

“Mr Laws stressed that councils should not censor reading material but that freedom needed to be counter-balanced against the right of parents to restrict reading choices for their children.

“‘Adolescent fiction has become increasingly edgy over recent years, but that should not necessarily be an excuse for younger children having access to inappropriate material. This is a good chance to debate the issue and invite further public and parental comment.’”

Aside from the fact that the library is already making conscientious efforts to shelve materials in an age-appropriate manner, Laws doesn’t sound nearly so reactionary or opportunist as some of the officials involved in the removal of Paul Gravett’s Manga: 60 Years of Japanese Comics from a California library system last year.

Reading both articles in the Chronicle, it sounds like Gordon’s objections rest more with the criteria of the Office of Film and Literature Classification than the library itself. If some of the books in question are volumes of Chobits, Tokyopop has clearly labeled them “OT: Older Teen Age 16+,” which is consistent with the R16 rating returned by the office.

Bibliopalooza

The Beat pointed to Booklist’s Top 10 Graphic Novels for Youth, which led me to discover that the magazine devoted the entire March 15 issue to a “Spotlight on Graphic Novels.”

Other features include:

  • A piece on the building blocks of a library manga collection for teens, by Robin Brenner
  • The Top Ten Graphic Novels 2007, i.e., those books the magazine reviewed most favorably between March 2006 and January 2007
  • An interview with Gene (American Born Chinese) Yang and Andy (Owly) Runton
  • An interview with Alison (Fun Home) Bechdel, which includes discussion of the recently resolved controversy in Marshall, Missouri
  • And bunches of other awesome stuff.
  • Seriously, go, read.

    In the (Democrat-)News

    Here’s the report from Rachel Harper at the Democrat-News on last night’s Marshall Public Library Board of Trustees meeting. My favorite bit is a passage quoting John Carton, director of a local youth services agency, speaking on behalf of Fun Home and Blankets:

    “He told of the personal identity issues of the characters in the books and the isolation the characters went through.

    “He said it requires strength to go through those experiences.

    “‘We should encourage those processes, not discourage them,’ Carton said. Isolation can be devastating to kids, he said.”

    More on Marshall

    Marshall Public Library director Amy Crump was kind enough to answer a couple of questions about last night’s Board of Trustees meeting via e-mail:

    “Yes, the Marshall Public Library Board of Trustees adopted the new Materials Selection Policy last night. As stated in October, they then re-examined the books Fun Home and Blankets in light of the new policy, in order to decide what action should be taken.

    “Fun Home had been shelved with the adult biographies and will be returned to that spot. Blankets had been shelved with Young Adult materials and will be moved to the adult general fiction.

    “The Marshall Public Library does not have a special section for graphic novels. They are shelved in the appropriate area (fiction, non-fiction).

    “I just want to say that I am so pleased with all the Board’s hard work on this policy. They have written a policy that will enable the Marshall Public Library to continue to add quality literature to the collection for the foreseeable future.”

    The contested books are back on the shelves, and the library has a policy in place that will help them respond to these kind of issues in the future. Everybody wins!

    Fun Home, Blankets back on the shelf

    The Democrat-News hasn’t posted its coverage of last night’s meeting of the Marshall, Mo. Public Library Board yet, but library director Amy Crump left a comment here that says:

    “The Marshall Public Library Board of Trustees voted to return both ‘Fun Home’ and ‘Blankets’ to the library’s shelves on Wednesday, March 14, 2007.”

    That’s great news, and I’ll try and e-mail Ms. Crump for more details.

    Second reading

    The Marshall, Mo., Public Library Board will hold the second reading of its proposed materials selection policy at a meeting tonight, according to the Democrat-News.

    Here’s a preview of the policy, and here’s a report on the first reading, held last month.