I’m confused. I’ve read Alan David Doane’s Five Questions with Mark Millar. I’ve read Doane’s comments on the work of Geoff Johns.
Is Millar honestly that much better than (or distinct from) Johns? As near as I can tell, the major difference is that Johns writes middling, violent stories about super-heroes because he loves them, and Millar writes middling, violent stories about super-heroes because he sort of hates them. Where’s the gap?